In the virtual video game "Fallout 3," creators depict a post-apocalyptic Washington DC, where landmarks like the US Capitol and Lincoln Memorial lie in ruins. Maybe feeling threatened, Capitol Hill has used the game as a catalyst for re-opening the video game/free-expression debate. With video games so obviously marketed to young people (who have more time on their hands), many believe that artistic freedom and the First Ammendment that has protected video games as art thus far, should be reconsidered. Congress is proposing a bill that would create movie-like ratings for video games, and therefore make it illegal for people under the age of 17 to buy certain games. Games that make millions, like "Grand Theft Auto" and "Bully," claim that such restrictions violate their rights and would cripple their industry.
FOR: Dangerous video games are obscene and should be regulated by the US Government to restrict access to them by young people.
AGAINST: Video games are visual art and must be protected by the First Ammendment. Leave 'em alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment